XARTATOMS · M104 热晕 X 射线分析手册XARTATOMS · M104 hot-halo X-ray analysis handbook

面向大一物理学生的半实时工作台A semi-live workbench for a first-year physics undergraduate
目录(全部页面)Contents (all pages)

XARTATOMS 研究 M104(草帽星系)的热气体晕:用 XMM-Newton 与 Chandra 的 X 射线光谱,测出晕内气体的温度、密度、熵随半径的分布,并检验“引力束缚的静力气体”与“反馈加热的风”两种图景。数据是 XMM 的三次观测(中心 0900170101 加两个偏置指向),拟合用 Sherpa 的 APEC 热等离子体模型加多种背景成分。当前科学基线是 v18 拟合管线。

XARTATOMS studies the hot-gas halo of M104 (the Sombrero Galaxy): using X-ray spectra from XMM-Newton and Chandra it measures how the temperature, density and entropy of the halo gas change with radius, and tests the two competing pictures — a gravitationally bound hydrostatic gas versus a feedback-heated wind. The data are three XMM observations (central 0900170101 plus two offset pointings); the fitting uses Sherpa with an APEC thermal-plasma model plus several background components. The current science baseline is the v18 fitting pipeline.

cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md(One-paragraph project summary)/ cognition-os/CLAUDE.md

项目骨架(最新)

Project skeleton (latest)

XMM EPIC + Chandra event files ESAS / SAS extraction source + QPB + SP + ARF/RMF v18 joint fitting (Sherpa) 1T APEC + background model radial kT profile ≈ 0.72–0.76 keV inside 23 kpc beta-model deprojection n_e(r) → entropy K 2D maps (open) intensity map; kT map waits for Q-A SZ / X-ray tension parked (S04)

数据流:事件文件 → ESAS/SAS 提取 → v18 联合拟合 → 径向温度/熵轮廓 →(待做)2D 图。红色虚线为已搁置的 SZ 对比。 Data flow: event files → ESAS/SAS extraction → v18 joint fitting → radial kT/entropy profiles → (to do) 2D maps. The dashed red box is the parked SZ comparison.

四问目标(2026-10-14 PI 新增)

The four-question objectives (added by the PI on 2026-10-14)

目标Objective 问题Question 状态Status 当前最佳数字(来源)Best current number (source) 趋势Trend
Q-AQ-A 哪种本地拟合策略给出的投影温度可靠? Which local fitting strategy gives a reliable projected temperature? QuestionedQuestioned 内区(2–4′)参考 = MOS2 单相机(S3):四个背景错设臂全部通过(偏差 +0.008…+0.014 keV,覆盖率 0.71–0.77);8–10′ 无策略合格(kT ≤ 1 keV 上界撞墙 4–11%,CXB×1.1 偏差 +0.035 keV);视场边缘与 2D 图未合格;红队 RT-02 后 D48 收窄为 Questioned(MOS2 优于 MOS1 成立,但 MOS2 自身未被证明干净 — D50/T159)— cognition-os/insights/I067_*.md;cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D50。新增(2026-10-16,R020/D64/B024):PI 提出“v2 mask 把盘侧遮得太狠”,mask 深度阶梯阶段 A 检验后被红队 RT-17 推翻——v18 实际把源幂律(SrcPo)固定在 0,所谓“轻 mask 只偏 ≤ 0.012 keV”需要一个 v18 没有的自由幂律成分;按 v18 的真实合同,只遮延展源+恒星会把 2–4′ kT 推高 +0.18…+0.22 keV → 全套 v2 点源 mask 在所有 v18 合同谱、Fe-L 硬度与 2D 图上继续使用,窄阶段 B 取消。教训:写 brief/决策前必须读模型成分的最终状态(所有 set/freeze 之后),不能只读声明(B024) Inner (2–4′) reference = MOS2-only (S3): passes all four background-misspecification arms (bias +0.008…+0.014 keV, coverage 0.71–0.77); 8–10′ none qualified (kT ≤ 1 keV bound hits 4–11 %, CXB×1.1 bias +0.035 keV); edge and the 2D map unqualified; after red team RT-02, D48 is narrowed to Questioned (MOS2 preferred over MOS1 stands, but MOS2 itself is not shown clean — D50/T159) — cognition-os/insights/I067_*.md; cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D50. New (2026-10-16, R020/D64/B024): the PI asked whether the v2 mask masks the disk side too hard; the mask-depth-ladder stage A test was overturned by red team RT-17 — v18 as run freezes the source power law (SrcPo) at 0, so the "lighter mask biases kT by only ≤ 0.012 keV" result needs a free power-law component that v18 does not have; under the literal v18 contract, masking only extended sources + stars pushes the 2–4′ kT up by +0.18…+0.22 keV → the full v2 point mask stays for every v18-contract spectrum, the Fe-L hardness and the 2D maps, and the narrow stage B is cancelled. Lesson: read a model component's final state (after all set/freeze lines), not its declaration, before writing a brief or a decision (B024)
Q-BQ-B Chandra+XMM 联合的 M104 温度 profile 是什么(10′ 内)? What is the Chandra+XMM kT profile of M104 (within 10′)? First profileFirst profile 径向 kT 问题(升 vs 平)开放,只由预注册的匹配合同测试(D55)判定:扇区谱外热(A2 +0.22 / A1 +0.37 keV 点对比,外区未合格);单温 Fe-L 硬度平(0.77–0.79 keV,2–12′,I068/T160;两相混合可给出同样 H,RT-06);Chandra-only 与单一温度 0.725 keV 一致(p = 0.54,D56;内环在 I3 瞄准芯片、外环在 FI 芯片,D61 更正 S3 说法;污染模型版本影响 ≤ 0.012 keV)——但红队 RT-23 已分诊(R028/D69):这条不能用来反对 XMM 的外升,因为 Chandra 2–10′ 的“环”其实只有 35–62% 的部分环带(8–10′ 的两个 ObsID 各盖对面一半),而共同 kT 检验探不到 ΔkT ≲ 0.27 keV 的差(8–10′ 的 95% 上界 0.954 keV 包含 XMM 的 0.90)→ “Chandra 等温”既没有匹配的孔径、也没有功率去证实或否证 XMM 的升;“张力 = 合同不匹配”已撤回(R009);测试暂停:Virgo 阶段 1 的口径谱缺 v2 mask(B023)→ 阶段 1b 重抽(曾被 Virgo 网络中断挡住,08:39Z 恢复);红队 RT-15(0.7 keV 前景成分:v18 该槽位实为 0 且冻结 → D62 只是外区 kT 的附带假设)与 RT-16(固定 Z = 0.3:Z = 1.5 真值按 Z = 0.3 拟合在 8–10′ 只低 0.017 keV → 不是外升成因,D63;阶段 5 把 Z = 1 与 Z 自由作次要诊断)已分诊 → 待定的是阶段 5 本身 — cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D55/D56/D62/D63/D69 The radial kT question (rise vs flat) is open, decided only by the pre-registered matched-contract test (D55): sector spectra are hotter outside (A2 +0.22 / A1 +0.37 keV point contrasts, outer unqualified); the one-temperature Fe-L hardness is flat (0.77–0.79 keV over 2–12′, I068/T160; a two-phase mixture can give the same H, RT-06); Chandra-only is consistent with one temperature 0.725 keV (p = 0.54, D56; the inner ring is on the I3 aim-point chip and the outer ring on FI chips — D61 corrects the "S3" wording; the contamination-model version moves kT by ≤ 0.012 keV) — but red team RT-23 is triaged (R028/D69): this cannot be used against the XMM rise, because the Chandra 2–10′ "rings" are only 35–62 % partial annuli (the two 8–10′ ObsIDs cover opposite halves) and the common-kT test cannot detect a ΔkT below ≈ 0.27 keV (the 8–10′ 95 % upper bound of 0.954 keV contains the XMM 0.90) → "Chandra isothermal" has neither a matched aperture nor the power to corroborate or refute the XMM rise; "tension = contract mismatch" is withdrawn (R009); the test is paused: the Virgo stage-1 aperture spectra lack the v2 mask (B023) → stage 1b re-extracts them (blocked for a while by a Virgo network outage, resumed 08:39Z); red teams RT-15 (a 0.7 keV foreground component: that v18 slot is actually 0 and frozen → D62 is only a stated assumption for the outer kT) and RT-16 (fixed Z = 0.3: a Z = 1.5 truth fitted with Z = 0.3 reads only 0.017 keV low at 8–10′ → not the cause of the rise, D63; stage 5 reports Z = 1 and Z-free as a secondary diagnostic) are triaged → what is pending is stage 5 itself — cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D55/D56/D62/D63/D69
Q-CQ-C 为何 ~13′ 亮度反而比内侧和 15–30′ 更亮? Why is the intensity brighter at ~13′ than inside and at 15–30′? Resolved: artefactResolved: artefact 假象(Provisional,I065):flux 已是每 arcmin²(B020),旧 flux/area 双重归一;裸 SB 比 1.37,冻结 kT 后 1.07;图像 1.041±0.068 无超出;WARP 星系团拟合为 0 — cognition-os/insights/I065_*.md;经受住红队 RT-01(4 条次要、0 条实质;图像检验 −2.7σ 支持无超出,I065 修订);开放:外环拟合方法;15–45′ profile 为 Questioned(E039:偏移拟合简并/不自洽,需 0501 ODF + Virgo 重处理) Artefact (Provisional, I065): the saved flux is already per arcmin² (B020), so the old flux/area double-normalised; bare-SB ratio 1.37, 1.07 with kT frozen; images 1.041±0.068 show no excess; the WARP cluster fits to 0 — cognition-os/insights/I065_*.md; it survived red team RT-01 (4 minor, 0 material objections; the image test at −2.7σ supports no excess, I065 amendment); open: the outer-ring fit method; the 15–45′ profile is Questioned (E039: offset fits degenerate/inconsistent; needs the 0501 ODF + Virgo re-reduction)
Q-DQ-D 2D 强度图 + 2D 温度图(区分 feedback 与引力束缚气体) 2D intensity map + 2D kT map (feedback vs gravitationally bound gas) OpenOpen 亮度图已完成;2D 代理图(阶段 2,E038):Fe-L × 象限锚点;联合 MOS2+pn0 的小轴 vs 盘对比在 ≲ 0.08–0.11 keV 内(校准区间,随半径/几何变化,非对称:±45° 2–5′ [−0.056,+0.076] keV)——对比度响应 R≈0.67–1.0 决定灵敏度;N>S 只是提示(跨臂族 p≈1),不是探测(E038 + RT-07 修订)— cognition-os/experiments/E038_*.md(D49)。新增(2026-10-16):2D 强度(E042/R016)— 2–5′ 的盘对齐不对称(小轴/盘 0.674 ± 0.100)与平滑 β 椭圆率一致(注入预测 0.752 [0.656, 0.846]),≥ +30% 小轴双锥在 2–5′ 被排除;2D kT(E043/R018)— 最佳估计器 = Fe-L 2 能带 + MOS1(自由归一)在 cone45 bin 上(σ ×1.12,注入无偏),但只适用于 3 相机共同足迹(面积的 56%),第二臂一致;生产图(P12/E045):逐 bin 数值复现 阶段 3,读数 = 2–5′ 无小轴 vs 盘对比、内区 N−S +0.10 keV 提示(仅一种方法,待定;东箭头曾画成朝西,修正中,修好前不展示该图)。折叠 2D kT 图 v2(E046/T171,Provisional 暂定,见状态页 §2h):四象限关于光学长/短轴折叠(每箱约 4 倍计数),主估计器 E1 = MOS2 + pn0,v2 mask 全程应用;2–12′ 的逐箱 kT 中位带为 0.70–0.80 keV(逐箱范围 0.53–0.89 keV,全局 0.736 keV [0.723, 0.748],8/21 箱在带外——措辞按 RT-20/D68/R025 收窄),全角度斜率 +0.009 keV/角分(95 % [−0.003, +0.020],+1.5σ)→ 对这种单温代理而言无 ≥ 2σ 的内冷外热;每 5′ 升 0.1 keV 的梯度 91% 可被探测(≈ 95% 排除,但只对单温代理成立——该代理会漏掉真实上升的 13–18%);盘楔外箱 0.85–0.88 vs 小轴楔 0.61–0.77 keV 只是提示(≈ 1.4σ,pn0 主导、近视场边缘);MOS2 与 pn0 逐箱一致(p = 0.60);pn0 QPB 按 M104 自己的 0.772 ± 0.016 缩放会把斜率推到 ≈ 2σ → 趋势对背景敏感(缩放仅测试用);< 2′ 核被 mask 遮住,冷却流在此不可检验;E045 的内区 N−S +0.10 keV 提示经 RT-19 多重比较后降为 Questioned(R022)— cognition-os/experiments/E046_*.md Intensity map done; the 2D proxy map (stage 2, E038): Fe-L × quadrant anchors; the joint MOS2+pn0 minor-axis vs disk contrast lies within ≲ 0.08–0.11 keV (calibrated intervals, radius/geometry-dependent, asymmetric: ±45° 2–5′ [−0.056,+0.076] keV) — the contrast response R≈0.67–1.0 sets the sensitivity; N>S is only a hint (cross-arm familywise p≈1), not a detection (E038 + RT-07 amendment) — cognition-os/experiments/E038_*.md (D49). New (2026-10-16): 2D intensity (E042/R016) — the 2–5′ disk-aligned asymmetry (minor/disk 0.674 ± 0.100) is consistent with smooth β ellipticity (injection prediction 0.752 [0.656, 0.846]); a ≥ +30 % minor-axis bicone is excluded at 2–5′; 2D kT (E043/R018) — the best estimator is the Fe-L 2-band + MOS1 (free normalisation) on cone45 bins (σ ×1.12, unbiased in injections), but only on the 3-camera common footprint (56 % of the area); the second arm agrees; the production maps (P12/E045) replay stage 3 exactly and read: no minor-axis vs disk contrast at 2–5′, an inner N−S +0.10 keV hint (one method only, pending; the East arrow was once drawn toward West — the fix is in progress and the map is not shown until it is). The folded 2D kT map v2 (E046/T171, Provisional; see state §2h): the four quadrants folded about the optical major/minor axes (≈4× counts per bin), primary estimator E1 = MOS2 + pn0, the v2 mask applied throughout; the per-bin kT over 2–12′ has a median band of 0.70–0.80 keV (per-bin range 0.53–0.89 keV; global 0.736 keV [0.723, 0.748]; 8/21 bins outside the band — wording narrowed per RT-20/D68/R025) and the all-angle slope is +0.009 keV/arcmin (95 % [−0.003, +0.020], +1.5σ) → no inner-cool/outer-hot trend at ≥ 2σ for this one-temperature proxy; a gradient of +0.1 keV per 5′ would be detected 91 % of the time (disfavoured at ≈ 95 %, but for the one-temperature proxy only — that proxy hides 13–18 % of a real rise); the disk wedge's outer cells 0.85–0.88 vs the minor wedge 0.61–0.77 keV are suggestive only (≈ 1.4σ, pn0-driven, near the field edge); MOS2 and pn0 agree bin by bin (p = 0.60); scaling pn0's QPB to M104's own 0.772 ± 0.016 pushes the slope to ≈ 2σ → the trend is background-sensitive (the scaling is test-only); the core inside 2′ is masked, so a cooling flow cannot be tested here; E045's inner N−S +0.10 keV hint is downgraded to Questioned after RT-19's multiplicity check (R022) — cognition-os/experiments/E046_*.md

2D 温度图 v2(四象限折叠,E046/T171,暂定)

The 2D kT map v2 (four quadrants folded, E046/T171, Provisional)

folded 2D kT map v2 summary: folded maps and radial profiles

折叠 2D kT 图 v2 总览(E046,Provisional 暂定):上排 = 固定箱/自适应箱的折叠温度图与“对称模型展示”(色标 0.7–0.9 keV,斜线阴影 = 95% 区间开放),下排 = 盘楔/小轴楔/全角度的径向剖面(粗 = 68%、细 = 95% 条件区间,虚线 = 拟合斜率)。2–12′ 的逐箱 kT 中位带为 0.70–0.80 keV(逐箱范围 0.53–0.89 keV,全局 0.736 keV),全角度斜率 +0.009 keV/角分(+1.5σ)→ 对这种单温代理而言无 ≥ 2σ 的内冷外热。完整六图与折叠安全性检验见状态页 §2h。图内文字为英文。 Overview of the folded 2D kT map v2 (E046, Provisional): top row = the folded temperature maps on fixed/adaptive bins plus the "symmetric model display" (0.7–0.9 keV colour scale, diagonal hatching = an open 95 % interval), bottom row = the radial profiles for the disk wedge, the minor-axis wedge and all angles (thick = 68 %, thin = 95 % conditional intervals, dashed = the fitted slope). the per-bin kT over 2–12′ has a median band of 0.70–0.80 keV (per-bin range 0.53–0.89 keV; global 0.736 keV) and the all-angle slope is +0.009 keV/arcmin (+1.5σ) → no inner-cool/outer-hot trend at ≥ 2σ for this one-temperature proxy. All six figures and the folding-safety tests are on the state page §2h. Figure text is English.

.agent/jobs/2026-10-16-2d-ktmap-folded-v2/out/sol/pi_summary.png(E046)

更早的科学目标

Older science objectives

目标Objective 状态Status 当前最佳数字(来源)Best current number (source)
密度/熵轮廓(S06 主线) Density/entropy profile (S06 main line) ProvisionalProvisional K ≈ 67 → 407 keV cm²(10–43 kpc);t_cool ≈ 10 → 137 Gyr — figure/radial_thermo_profiles_v18/entropy_cooling_time_profile_v18_v15beta.csv K ≈ 67 → 407 keV cm² (10–43 kpc); t_cool ≈ 10 → 137 Gyr — figure/radial_thermo_profiles_v18/entropy_cooling_time_profile_v18_v15beta.csv
SZ / X 射线张力(~2 倍差异) SZ / X-ray tension (~2× discrepancy) ParkedParked X 射线导出 SZ 比参考高约 2 倍;数据版本问题 — cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md(S04) X-ray-derived SZ is ~2× the reference; data-version issue — cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md (S04)

未解问题

Open problems

问题Problem 为什么重要Why it matters 最佳假设Best hypothesis 下一个检验Next test 负责人Owner 状态Status
Q-A:无策略被认证;全网格验证未跑,需加速 Q-A: no strategy certified; the full validation grid has not run and needs acceleration 没有“谁对谁错”的判据,任何温度图都建立在未验证的方法上 Without a criterion, every temperature map rests on an unvalidated method 内区参考已收窄(D50:MOS2 优于 MOS1 成立,MOS2 自身未证明干净);外区/边缘仍不合格——S4 宽 kT 多起点合同的测试背景偏差 ≤ 0.05 keV,但严格合格门失败 → 外区 kT 只作探索性引用;D54 修订(RT-09):±0.05 keV 是逐臂中位偏差包络,逐拟合 68% 散布 ≈ ±0.15 keV 须由拟合区间给出,SP+CXB+QPB 组合压力未测(同号和 +0.14 keV @0.7 keV),撞顶 3/480(D51/D54/T162/I069) The inner reference is narrowed (D50: MOS2 preferred over MOS1 stands; MOS2 itself not shown clean); outer/edge still not qualified — the S4 wide-kT multi-start contract sees tested background biases ≤ 0.05 keV but fails the strict gate → outer kT stays exploratory; D54 amendment (RT-09): the ±0.05 keV is the median-bias envelope of one-at-a-time stress arms, the per-fit 68 % scatter ≈ ±0.15 keV must come from the fit interval, the combined SP+CXB+QPB stress is untested (same-sign sum +0.14 keV at 0.7 keV), ceiling hits 3/480 (D51/D54/T162/I069) 阶段 3/4 已完成(S4 外区/边缘/2D 均未过严格门);mask 深度阶梯阶段 A 的"内区谱可轻 mask"结论被 RT-17 推翻(R020/D64:v18 把 SrcPo 固定在 0,轻 mask 偏 2–4′ kT +0.18…+0.22 keV → 全套 v2 点源 mask 保留,窄阶段 B 取消);阶段 5 匹配合同测试(D55)等阶段 1b 产品 Stages 3/4 are done (S4 fails the strict gate in the outer/edge/2D cells); mask-depth-ladder stage A's "lighter mask safe for inner spectra" conclusion was overturned by RT-17 (R020/D64: v18 freezes SrcPo at 0, a lighter mask biases the 2–4′ kT by +0.18…+0.22 keV → the full v2 point mask stays, the narrow stage B is cancelled); the stage-5 matched-contract test (D55) waits for the stage-1b products I067/D48–D50;E044/D60;阶段 5 = D55I067/D48–D50; E044/D60; stage 5 = D55 待定 PendingPending
Q-B:第一条联合 profile 已出,但交叉标定与外区 CXB 处理未定 Q-B: the first joint profile exists, but cross-calibration and the outer CXB treatment are unsettled 10′ 内的 Chandra+XMM 温度 profile 是四问之一,也是温度图的输入 The Chandra+XMM kT profile within 10′ is one of the four questions and an input to the temperature map J-linked(ACIS CXB 自由)0.718/0.757/0.782/0.934 keV;Chandra-only 与 v18 每 ≤1σ 一致;但 c_ACIS 常压在 0.7 下界、c_MOS2 在 4′ 外压 1.3 上界 → 联合归一化 Questioned(T155) J-linked (ACIS CXB free) 0.718/0.757/0.782/0.934 keV; Chandra-only agrees with v18 within 1σ per ring; but c_ACIS often sits at its 0.7 lower bound and c_MOS2 at 1.3 beyond 4′ → joint normalisation Questioned (T155) 阶段 5 匹配合同测试(D55 预注册规则,已冻结)等 Virgo 阶段 1b 的 v2-mask 口径谱;阶段 1b 内容门已过、引擎恢复合同不允许复用 B3 → 全新整跑(10:31Z 授权)→ 待定;Chandra-only 0.725 keV 等温读数(D56/D61)作次要诊断;RT-15(D62)与 RT-16(D63:Z = 1.5 真值只低 0.017 keV → 不是成因;阶段 5 报 Z = 1 与 Z 自由)已分诊;RT-18(v18 合同审计)与 RT-19(2D kT 生产图)已分诊(13:20Z:as-run 能段 0.375–9.0 keV 重放证实 → B025/R023;内区 N−S +0.10 keV 提示经多重比较后降为 Questioned → R022);RT-20(攻击折叠图)、RT-21(B025 后的阶段 5 规格书)运行中;P16 测量 as-run 能段与 RASS 过滤器对已存 kT 的影响(待定) The stage-5 matched-contract test (D55 pre-registered rule, frozen) waits for the Virgo stage-1b v2-masked aperture spectra; stage 1b's content gate passed but the engine's resume contract admits no lane reusing B3 → a fresh full run (authorised 10:31Z) → pending; the Chandra-only 0.725 keV isothermal reading (D56/D61) stays a secondary diagnostic; RT-15 (D62) and RT-16 (D63: a Z = 1.5 truth reads only 0.017 keV low → not the cause; stage 5 reports Z = 1 and Z-free) are triaged; RT-18 (the v18-contract audit) and RT-19 (the 2D kT production maps) are triaged (13:20Z: the as-run band 0.375–9.0 keV confirmed by replay → B025/R023; the inner N−S +0.10 keV hint is downgraded to Questioned after the multiplicity check → R022); RT-20 (attacking the folded map) and RT-21 (the stage-5 specification after B025) are running; P16 measures the effect of the as-run band and the RASS filter on the saved kT (pending) job 2026-10-15-chandra-xmm-perinst-profilejob 2026-10-15-chandra-xmm-perinst-profile RunningRunning
v18 的 as-run 能段(0.375–9.0 keV)与损坏的 RASS 过滤器对已存 kT 的影响(B025) The effect of v18's as-run band (0.375–9.0 keV) and the broken RASS filter on the saved kT (B025) 所有引用 v18 温度的数字都建立在这个合同上;合同此前被误述为 0.4–3.2 keV,而 3.2–9 keV 的影响从未测量 Every number quoting a v18 temperature rests on this contract; the contract was mis-stated as 0.4–3.2 keV and the effect of the 3.2–9 keV range was never measured as run:源 0.375–9.0 keV、背景 0.375–6.23 keV(Sherpa notice/ignore 取并集,RT-18 从保存会话重放证实);SrcPo 不在拟合表达式里;RASS 过滤器损坏(21.9% 的 noticed 信号落在原定 0.2 keV 以下,未重放);16/65 个已存 kT 的 conf() 区间越出参数界 → 无效 As run: source 0.375–9.0 keV, background 0.375–6.23 keV (Sherpa's notice/ignore take a union; RT-18 confirmed this by replaying the saved session); SrcPo is absent from the fitted expression; the RASS filter is corrupt (21.9 % of its noticed signal lies below the intended 0.2 keV, not yet replayed); 16/65 saved kT conf() intervals extend outside the parameter bounds → invalid P16:恢复 7 个会话并引用其 noticed 能段;重拟合 (a) as restored 复现已存 kT(±0.005 keV 内)、(b) 0.4–3.2 keV、(c) RASS 修复、(d) 两者都改,给出 keV 与 σ 的 ΔkT 表;初步结果:R2-4 A1 从 0.4–3.2 keV 改回 as-run 使 kT 变化 −0.021 keV,且已存会话不在其最小值(重拟合 −0.018 keV,stat 72.8 → 42.4) P16: restore 7 sessions with their noticed ranges quoted; refits (a) as restored reproduces the saved kT within 0.005 keV, (b) 0.4–3.2 keV, (c) RASS fixed, (d) both, with a ΔkT table in keV and σ; partial result: for R2-4 A1, going from 0.4–3.2 keV back to as-run changes kT by −0.021 keV, and the saved session is not at its minimum (the refit gives −0.018 keV, stat 72.8 → 42.4) P16(luna);B025;D65e;RT-18P16 (luna); B025; D65e; RT-18 待定 PendingPending
Q-C:外环谱的拟合方法;15–30′ 对比(R′)不可测 Q-C: the outer-ring spectral fit method; the 15–30′ comparison (R′) not testable 13′ 假象已定性(I065),但外环(10–14′,FoV 边缘 ~50% 被裁)的谱点仍不可用:kT 上限撞 1 keV 参数顶、源/背景简并 The 13′ artefact is characterised (I065), but the outer-ring (10–14′, ~50% clipped at the FoV edge) spectral points remain unusable: kT upper limits hit the 1 keV ceiling, source/background degenerate 归一错误 + 弱信号简并(I065,Provisional) Normalisation error + weak-signal degeneracy (I065, Provisional) 更宽 kT 范围 + profile-likelihood 误差,或绑定/正则化径向模型,或用偏置指向(0900170501/0601) Wider kT range + profile-likelihood errors, or a tied/regularised radial model, or the offset pointings (0900170501/0601) Q-C 后续(并入 Virgo 再抽谱 D47)Q-C follow-up (folded into the Virgo re-reduction D47) OpenOpen
Q-D:2D 温度图(等 Q-A) Q-D: the 2D temperature map (waits for Q-A) feedback 与引力束缚气体的区分需要 2D 温度 Separating feedback from bound gas needs a 2D temperature field 按 D49 探索:窄带比值代理(Fe-L 硬度等)+ 自适应网格(WVT/共享核)+ 象限锚定;验收 = 形态保真度(均匀真值不出假结构、注入结构原位恢复、≥2 相机/方案一致),整体可控偏差可接受;谱拟合 3–4 个关键 bin 作校验 Explore per D49: narrow-band ratio proxies (e.g. Fe-L hardness) + adaptive grids (WVT/shared kernel) + quadrant anchors; acceptance = morphology fidelity (uniform truth → no spurious structure, injected structure recovered in place, consistent across ≥2 cameras/schemes), an overall controlled bias acceptable; spectral fits of 3–4 key bins as checks 亮度图已完成(阶段 2:v2-mask MOS2、QPB+天空扣除、β 残差与扇区对比,E042);2D kT 阶段 3 已完成(E043:估计器 E3 + cone45,双臂一致,共同足迹 56%);生产图(P12/E045)首批已出(读数:2–5′ 无小轴 vs 盘对比、内区 N−S +0.10 keV 提示,仅一种方法;东箭头方向缺陷修正中,修好前不展示该图)→ 待定;区域设计建议 cone45 bin;全套 v2 mask 保留(R020/D64)。当前最佳数字(折叠图,E046/T171,Provisional 暂定):四象限折叠的 2D kT 图 v2 给出 2–12′ 的逐箱 kT 中位带 0.70–0.80 keV(逐箱范围 0.53–0.89 keV,全局 0.736 keV,8/21 箱在带外——措辞按 RT-20/D68/R025 收窄)、全角度斜率 +0.009 keV/角分(95 % [−0.003, +0.020],+1.5σ)→ 对这种单温代理而言无 ≥ 2σ 的内冷外热;每 5′ 升 0.1 keV 的梯度 91% 可被探测(只对单温代理成立);盘楔外箱 0.85–0.88 vs 小轴楔 0.61–0.77 keV 只是提示(≈ 1.4σ);MOS2 与 pn0 逐箱一致(p = 0.60);pn0 QPB 缩放(测试用)会把斜率推到 ≈ 2σ → 趋势对背景敏感;< 2′ 核被 mask 遮住,冷却流不可检验(D66/P18 待定);E045 的内区 N−S 提示降为 Questioned(R022) The intensity map is done (stage 2: v2-masked MOS2, QPB + sky subtracted, β residuals and sector contrasts, E042); 2D kT stage 3 is done (E043: estimator E3 + cone45, both arms agree, common footprint 56 %); the first production maps (P12/E045) are out (readings: no minor-axis vs disk contrast at 2–5′, an inner N−S +0.10 keV hint, one method only; the East-arrow direction defect is being fixed and the map is not shown until it is) → pending; the region design recommends cone45 bins; the full v2 mask stays (R020/D64). Current best number (the folded map, E046/T171, Provisional): the four-quadrant-folded 2D kT map v2 gives a median per-bin kT band of 0.70–0.80 keV over 2–12′ (per-bin range 0.53–0.89 keV; global 0.736 keV; 8/21 bins outside the band — wording narrowed per RT-20/D68/R025) and an all-angle slope of +0.009 keV/arcmin (95 % [−0.003, +0.020], +1.5σ) → no inner-cool/outer-hot trend at ≥ 2σ for this one-temperature proxy; a gradient of +0.1 keV per 5′ would be detected 91 % of the time (for the one-temperature proxy only); the disk wedge's outer cells 0.85–0.88 vs the minor wedge 0.61–0.77 keV are suggestive only (≈ 1.4σ); MOS2 and pn0 agree bin by bin (p = 0.60); the pn0 QPB scaling (test-only) pushes the slope to ≈ 2σ → the trend is background-sensitive; the core inside 2′ is masked, so a cooling flow is untestable here (D66/P18 pending); E045's inner N−S hint is downgraded to Questioned (R022) E038/E042/E043/E046;P12 生产图;P15 折叠图 v2E038/E042/E043/E046; P12 production maps; P15 folded map v2 待定 PendingPending
MOS1 静态(非耀发)硬过剩:每个指向都偏高 MOS1 quiescent (non-flare) hard excess: high in every pointing MOS1 参与所有 v18 拟合;若其背景模型欠 5–20%,会偏置 kT MOS1 enters every v18 fit; a 5–20% background underestimate would bias kT 静态 SP 成分或 MOS1 参考系统误差(成因 Questioned) A quiescent SP component or MOS1 reference systematics (cause Questioned) Q-A 阶段 2:MOS1-free vs MOS1-with-extra-SP 拟合对比(I066) Q-A stage 2: MOS1-free vs MOS1-with-extra-SP fit tests (I066) I066/T151;Q-A 后续I066/T151; Q-A follow-up ProvisionalProvisional
点源/星系团遮蔽无法把残余压到 <5% Point-source/cluster masking cannot push residuals below 5% 弱晕区(R11-13 Angle2 残余/晕比当前 3.6)做任何温度测量前必须先处理残余 Before any temperature measurement in the faint-halo region (residual/halo currently 3.6 in R11-13 Angle2), the residual must be handled PSF 翼与星系团发射遮不掉(E035,mask 规则 v2 后残余/晕比仍 0.95) PSF wings and cluster emission are not maskable (E035; after mask rule v2 the residual/halo ratio is still 0.95) 建模残余:星系团作为 APEC 成分 + 空间加权残余模型;固定 CXB 归一须与 mask 流量阈值匹配(E035) Model the residual: the cluster as an APEC component + a spatially weighted residual model; the fixed CXB normalisation must match the mask flux cut (E035) E035;Virgo 再抽谱 D47E035; the Virgo re-reduction D47 ProvisionalProvisional
Virgo 再抽谱计划(D47) The Virgo re-reduction plan (D47) B020/I065/E035 的修正(正确 SB、mask v2、建模残余)都要落到新的提取产品上 The corrections from B020/I065/E035 (correct SB, mask v2, modelled residual) must land in new extraction products 以 v1.7.8 基线复现为对照,每阶段只改一个设计元素 Reproduce the v1.7.8 baseline as the control, then change one design element per stage S0 基线复现已 PASS(事件级复现,E040);阶段 1 完成但口径谱只有自动 mask(B023)→ 阶段 1b 重抽 v2-mask 口径谱:内容门已过,引擎恢复合同不允许复用 B3 通道 → 已授权一次全新的完整 v1.7.8 整跑(约 1.5–2 小时)→ 待定 The s0 baseline reproduction PASSed (event-level reproduction, E040); stage 1 finished but its aperture spectra carry only the automatic mask (B023) → stage 1b re-extracts the v2-masked aperture spectra: the content gate passed, but the engine's resume contract admits no lane reusing B3 → a fresh full v1.7.8 run was authorised (≈1.5–2 h) → pending job virgo-rereduction-s0;D47/D57;B023job virgo-rereduction-s0; D47/D57; B023 待定 PendingPending

未来 1–4 周计划

Plan for the next 1–4 weeks

计划完全来自 cognition-os/02_CURRENT_QUESTION.md(2026-10-16 节,只保留当前状态)与各 job 的 BRIEF/REPORT,不是本手册的发明。2026-10-16 09:39Z 更新:Q-B 的决定性检验是 D55 预注册的匹配合同测试(规则已在任何阶段 5 拟合前冻结),但它暂停——Virgo 阶段 1 的口径谱只有自动 mask(B023),阶段 1b 在重抽(Virgo 网络中断 ≈06:45–08:3xZ,08:39Z 恢复);Chandra-only 与单一温度 0.725 keV 一致(D56/D61),“合同不匹配”表述已撤回(R009);Q-D:2D 强度阶段 2 完成(E042/R016:2–5′ 不对称与 β 椭圆率一致,≥+30% 双锥被排除),2D kT 阶段 3 完成(E043/R018:估计器 E3 + cone45,双臂一致,共同足迹 56%),生产图运行中;mask 深度阶梯阶段 A 的"内区谱可轻 mask"结论被 RT-17 推翻(R020/D64:v18 无自由源幂律,轻 mask 偏 +0.18…+0.22 keV → 全套 v2 mask 保留,阶段 B 取消);红队 RT-15(D62)、RT-16(D63:Z 不是外升成因)、RT-17(R020/D64)已分诊;RT-18(v18 合同逐成分审计,阶段 5 前必做)与 RT-19(2D kT 生产图)运行中(待定)。

The plan comes entirely from cognition-os/02_CURRENT_QUESTION.md (2026-10-16 section, current state only) and the job briefs/reports; it is not invented by this handbook. Update 2026-10-16 09:39Z: Q-B's decisive test is the D55 pre-registered matched-contract test (its rule frozen before any stage-5 fit), but it is paused — the Virgo stage-1 aperture spectra carry only the automatic mask (B023) and stage 1b is re-extracting them (Virgo network outage ≈06:45–08:3xZ, resumed 08:39Z); Chandra-only is consistent with one temperature 0.725 keV (D56/D61) and the "contract mismatch" headline is withdrawn (R009); Q-D: 2D intensity stage 2 done (E042/R016: the 2–5′ asymmetry is consistent with β ellipticity, a ≥ +30 % bicone is excluded), 2D kT stage 3 done (E043/R018: estimator E3 + cone45, both arms agree, common footprint 56 %), the production maps are running; mask-depth-ladder stage A's "lighter mask safe for inner spectra" conclusion was overturned by RT-17 (R020/D64: v18 has no free source power law, a lighter mask biases +0.18…+0.22 keV → the full v2 mask stays, stage B cancelled); red teams RT-15 (D62), RT-16 (D63: Z is not the cause of the rise) and RT-17 (R020/D64) are triaged; RT-18 (a per-component audit of the v18 contract, required before stage 5) and RT-19 (the 2D kT production maps) are running (Pending).

周Week 内容Content
11已完成:Q-A 清单、试点、阶段 2 全网格(4,800 拟合)→ MOS2 内区参考(D48/I067) Done: Q-A inventory, pilot, stage-2 full grid (4,800 fits) → MOS2 inner reference (D48/I067)
11已完成:Q-C 判为假象(I065);红队 RT-01 攻击中;15–45′ 轮廓 job 运行中 Done: Q-C judged an artefact (I065); red team RT-01 attacking; the 15–45′ profile job running
1–21–2已完成:Q-D 亮度图;2D 代理阶段 2(E038:联合 MOS2+pn0、校准对比区间、N>S 提示);下一步 = Virgo 阶段 1 谱检验(P3 check_N/S_R2-4.9) Done: the Q-D intensity map; 2D proxy stage 2 (E038: joint MOS2+pn0, calibrated contrast bounds, N>S a hint); next = the Virgo stage 1 spectral check (P3 check_N/S_R2-4.9)
1–21–2待匹配合同:谱 vs Fe-L 硬度分歧(I068/I070)不能在旧产品上裁决;只由 D55 预注册的匹配合同测试判定(阶段 1b 的 v2-mask 产品就绪后);0900170501/0601 ODF 已下载校验(22:50Z)→ 阶段 1b 通过后 Virgo 重处理(外区 profile) Awaiting the matched contract: the spectral vs Fe-L-hardness disagreement (I068/I070) cannot be settled on the old products; it is decided only by the D55 pre-registered matched-contract test (once the stage-1b v2-masked products exist); the 0900170501/0601 ODFs are downloaded and verified (22:50Z) → Virgo re-reduction for the outer profile after stage 1b passes
2–42–4Q-A 阶段 3/4 完成(S4 外区/边缘未合格 → 探索性,D51/D54);Virgo 阶段 1 完成但口径谱只有自动 mask(B023)→ 阶段 1b 重抽 v2-mask 口径谱(内容门已过;引擎恢复合同不允许复用 B3 → 全新整跑,10:31Z 授权)→ 待定;阶段 5 = 匹配合同测试(D55 预注册规则,已冻结)等阶段 1b;mask 阶梯"轻 mask"结论被 RT-17 推翻(R020/D64:全套 v2 mask 保留、阶段 B 取消);红队 RT-15/RT-16/RT-17 已分诊(D62/D63/R020),RT-18/RT-19 已分诊(B025/R023、R022/D65),RT-20/RT-21 运行中;P16 测量 as-run 能段与 RASS 过滤器对已存 kT 的影响(待定);P18 端到端模拟(含 S7 = PI 的冷却流情景)说明数据排除哪些冷却流版本(待定) Q-A stages 3–4 done (S4 outer/edge not qualified → exploratory, D51/D54); Virgo stage 1 finished but its aperture spectra carry only the automatic mask (B023) → stage 1b re-extracts the v2-masked aperture spectra (content gate passed; the engine's resume contract admits no lane reusing B3 → a fresh full run authorised 10:31Z) → pending; stage 5 = the matched-contract test (D55 pre-registered rule, frozen) waiting for stage 1b; the mask ladder's "lighter mask" conclusion was overturned by RT-17 (R020/D64: the full v2 mask stays, stage B cancelled); red teams RT-15/RT-16/RT-17 triaged (D62/D63/R020), RT-18/RT-19 triaged (B025/R023, R022/D65), RT-20/RT-21 running; P16 measures the effect of the as-run band and the RASS filter on the saved kT (pending); P18, the end-to-end mock (including S7, the PI's cooling-flow scenario), will say which cooling-flow versions the data exclude (pending)

本次更新

What's new

数据截至

Data as of

2026-10-16 20:51Z(cognition-os/sessions/2026-10-14.md 从 22:50Z 起加 sessions/2026-10-16.md 到 20:39Z 的全部条目;07_REVISION_LOG.md R013–R030;04_DECISION_LOG.md D55–D70;03_TRUST_TABLE.md T163–T172;08_RUNNING.md 20:39Z;REDTEAM_QUEUE.md RT-10…RT-27;E040–E047、B022–B025、references/literature_m104_hot_halo_2026-10-16.md)。运行中的 job(Virgo 阶段 1b 并行口径通道、RT-26 OS 一致性、RT-27 拟合能段/P16、P18 的 codexnim 臂)结果待定;已完成并写入本页的:RT-20/R025/D68、RT-21/D67、RT-22/R027、RT-23/R028/D69、RT-24/R029/D70、RT-25/R030/D70、P16、P18 sol 臂(E047/T172/R026)、冷启动演练 3。

2026-10-16 20:51Z (all cognition-os/sessions/2026-10-14.md entries from 22:50Z plus sessions/2026-10-16.md to 20:39Z; 07_REVISION_LOG.md R013–R030; 04_DECISION_LOG.md D55–D70; 03_TRUST_TABLE.md T163–T172; 08_RUNNING.md 20:39Z; REDTEAM_QUEUE.md RT-10…RT-27; E040–E047, B022–B025, references/literature_m104_hot_halo_2026-10-16.md). Results of the running jobs (the Virgo stage-1b parallel aperture lanes, RT-26 on OS consistency, RT-27 on the fit band / P16, and P18's codexnim arm) are pending; done and written into this page: RT-20/R025/D68, RT-21/D67, RT-22/R027, RT-23/R028/D69, RT-24/R029/D70, RT-25/R030/D70, P16, P18's sol arm (E047/T172/R026) and cold-start drill 3.