这一页是给组会用的：每个活跃的 UTC 日一块，分成果 / 工作 / 问题 / 待 PI 决定四栏。每一条结果都带它的信任状态——被推翻或被红队质疑的结论不会写成普通结果。全部内容来自 cognition-os 的 sessions/、06_AGENT_LOG.md、07_REVISION_LOG.md、04_DECISION_LOG.md 与 08_RUNNING.md，没有本手册自己的发明。
This page is for the group meeting: one block per active UTC day, split into results / work / problems / PI decisions pending. Every result carries its trust state — an overturned or red-teamed claim is never written as a plain result. Everything here comes from cognition-os's sessions/, 06_AGENT_LOG.md, 07_REVISION_LOG.md, 04_DECISION_LOG.md and 08_RUNNING.md; nothing is invented by this handbook.
2026-10-15（四问计划启动；Q-C 破解与一次公开撤回）
2026-10-15 (the four-question programme starts; Q-C solved and one public retraction)
| 栏目Section | 内容Content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 成果（带信任状态） | Results (with their trust state) | Q-C 的 ~13′ 过亮改判为假象（Provisional，I065/T149）：v18 保存的 flux 本身就是每 arcmin² 的面亮度（B020，Trusted），旧的 flux/area 曲线除了两次面积。凸起大小 = 仅 Angle2、1.0–2.0，取决于 bin 配对/世代（任何世代都没有保存流量误差；1.37 只是其中一个世代），冻结 kT 后降到 1.07；独立 QPB 扣除图像外/内 = 1.041±0.068，不显示超出；WARP J1240.4−1147（z = 0.193）加 APEC 后拟合 norm 为 0（成因 Provisional）。Q-A 阶段 2（4,800 次注入–恢复，I067/E036/T157/T158/D48）：内区只有 MOS2 单相机策略在四个背景错设臂下稳健（偏差 +0.008…+0.014 keV，覆盖率 0.71–0.77）；8–10′ 无策略合格。GTI 审计（I066）：保留 2.filter；MOS1 静态硬过剩成为新开问题。第二方法：Fe-L 硬度单温反演全程 0.77–0.79 keV（2–12′），H(8–10′)−H(2–4′) = −0.04 ± 0.09（I068/T160，Provisional）。Q-D 亮度图完成（E041：第三次独立确认无 13′ 图像超出）。 |
Q-C's ~13′ excess is reclassified as an artefact (Provisional, I065/T149): the v18 saved flux is already a per-arcmin² surface brightness (B020, Trusted), so the old flux/area curve divided by area twice. The bump size is Angle2-only, 1.0–2.0 depending on bin pairing/generation (no flux errors were ever saved; 1.37 is one generation), dropping to 1.07 with kT frozen; independent QPB-subtracted images give outer/inner = 1.041±0.068 with no excess; the WARP J1240.4−1147 cluster (z = 0.193) fits to a norm of 0 as an added APEC (cause Provisional). Q-A stage 2 (4,800 injection–recovery fits, I067/E036/T157/T158/D48): in the inner region only the MOS2-only strategy is robust under all four background-misspecification arms (bias +0.008…+0.014 keV, coverage 0.71–0.77); at 8–10′ no strategy qualifies. The GTI audit (I066) keeps 2.filter; the MOS1 quiescent hard excess becomes a new open problem. The second method: the Fe-L one-temperature inversion is 0.77–0.79 keV over 2–12′ with H(8–10′)−H(2–4′) = −0.04 ± 0.09 (I068/T160, Provisional). The Q-D intensity map is done (E041: a third independent confirmation of no 13′ image excess). |
| 工作 | Work | 四个研究 job 并行派出（fit-reliability-audit、sb-profile-13arcmin、chandra-xmm-joint-status、2d-intensity-map），随后加派 GTI 审计、源 mask 设计、星系团检验、Chandra+XMM 逐仪器 profile、外区 profile 与 Fe-L 硬度。红队制度建立（REDTEAM_QUEUE.md，RT-01…RT-10 当日启动/分诊）：RT-01（13′ 假象）、RT-02（MOS2 参考）、RT-03（Chandra+XMM 升）、RT-05（mask v2）、RT-06（Fe-L 平）、RT-07（2D 界限）、RT-08（合同不匹配）、RT-09（±0.05 keV）。手册 H-XART-001 首次构建并两次部署。 | Four research jobs dispatched in parallel (fit-reliability-audit, sb-profile-13arcmin, chandra-xmm-joint-status, 2d-intensity-map), then the GTI audit, source-mask design, cluster test, Chandra+XMM per-instrument profile, the outer profile and the Fe-L hardness. The red-team system is created (REDTEAM_QUEUE.md; RT-01…RT-10 launched/triaged that day): RT-01 (the 13′ artefact), RT-02 (the MOS2 reference), RT-03 (the Chandra+XMM rise), RT-05 (mask v2), RT-06 (Fe-L flatness), RT-07 (2D bounds), RT-08 (contract mismatch), RT-09 (±0.05 keV). The handbook H-XART-001 was built and deployed twice. |
| 问题（含 agent 自己的错误与更正） | Problems (including the agent's own errors and corrections) | 一次公开撤回（02:40Z）：02:20Z 的"非嵌套通量"论证（子区通量高于母区 → 物理不自洽）被撤回——面亮度本来就允许子区更亮，论证读错了单位（B020）。mask 设计两臂都建在双重归一的晕面亮度上（65× 过暗）→ 阶段 2 用修正后的每 arcmin² 值重做。sol 的 cluster-13arcmin-test 因 OpenAI 503 死亡后重启。codexnim 的 /proc/stat 门误把 idle 当 busy，阻塞 Virgo 启动约 1.5 小时。红队 RT-02 采纳 3 条实质异议 → D50 把 D48 收窄为 Questioned（MOS2 优于 MOS1 成立，MOS2 自身未被证明干净）。RT-06：两相混合可给出同样的平硬度 → "等温"撤回，只说"单温反演平"。RT-05：v2 mask 在 R<4′ 遮掉 61% 计数 → D53（逐孔径携带保留面积分数）；该队自查单位后自己撤回 3 条异议。RT-08（当晚）：I070"主因是合同不匹配"的主表述撤回 → Questioned（GTI +0.017、背景需 ×2.2–2.4、响应 <1e-4，内外差值反号）。RT-09：±0.05 keV 改为逐臂中位包络口径（逐拟合 68% ≈ ±0.15 keV）。B021：硬度任务保存的 σ 因子写反（近似，平结论不受影响）。 | One public retraction (02:40Z): the 02:20Z "non-nested flux" argument (a sub-region's flux exceeding its parent's → physically inconsistent) is retracted — surface brightness may legitimately rise in a sub-region and the argument had misread the units (B020). Both arms of the mask design were built on the double-divided halo surface brightness (65× too faint) → stage 2 redone with the corrected per-arcmin² value. sol's cluster-13arcmin-test died on an OpenAI 503 and was resumed. codexnim's /proc/stat gate mis-read idle as busy, blocking the Virgo launch for ~1.5 h. Red team RT-02's 3 material objections were accepted → D50 narrows D48 to Questioned (MOS2 preferred over MOS1 stands; MOS2 itself is not shown clean). RT-06: a two-phase mixture reproduces the same flat hardness → "isothermal" is withdrawn; only "the one-T inversion is flat" stands. RT-05: the v2 mask removes 61 % of R<4′ counts → D53 (carry retained-area fractions per aperture); the team withdrew 3 of its own objections after a unit check. RT-08 (that evening): I070's "mainly a contract mismatch" headline is withdrawn → Questioned (GTI +0.017, background needs ×2.2–2.4, response <1e-4, and the inner/outer gaps flip sign). RT-09: ±0.05 keV becomes the median envelope per arm (per-fit 68 % ≈ ±0.15 keV). B021: the hardness job's saved σ swaps its variance factors (approximate; flatness unaffected). |
| 待 PI 决定 | PI decisions pending | 无（当日无待决项）。 | None (no pending item that day). |
2026-10-16（修订日志建立；一次"假通过"被抓住；2D 图与 mask 阶梯）
2026-10-16 (the revision log is created; a "false pass" is caught; 2D maps and the mask ladder)
| 栏目Section | 内容Content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 成果（带信任状态） | Results (with their trust state) | 阶段 5 的预注册判定规则 D55 在看结果前冻结（RISE / NO RESOLVED RISE / PROJECTION-COMPATIBLE / AMBIGUOUS；谱臂 95% 最小可探测 ΔkT ≈ 0.198 keV，RT-11 的 6 条设计异议全部作为设计变更采纳）。Virgo s0 经 RT-12 复核（E040）：事件级复现，但 ARF +4.2–4.7%、CCF 集不同 → 温度可比、norm/面亮度不可比（D57）。2D 强度阶段 2 + 注入检验（E042/R016，Provisional）：2–5′ 小轴/盘 0.674 ± 0.100 与平滑 β 椭圆率一致，≥+30% 双锥被排除。2D kT 阶段 3（E043/R018，Provisional）：估计器 E3 + cone45，双臂一致，共同足迹 56%。折叠 2D kT 图 v2（E046/T171，Provisional）：2–12′ 逐箱 kT 中位带 0.70–0.80 keV（全局 0.736 [0.723, 0.748]），全角度斜率 +0.009 keV/角分（+1.5σ）→ 对这种单温代理无 ≥2σ 内冷外热。P18 端到端模拟（E047/T172/R026，Provisional）：全角度 2–12′ 斜率功率 93.5%（修 vignetting 前是 62%），逐楔 2–8′ 只有 27–36%。文献摘要入库（Li+2007/2011、2026 SZ、Igarashi+2014：平的 kT profile 无法区分束缚气体与慢风）。 | Stage 5's pre-registered decision rule D55 is frozen before any result is read (RISE / NO RESOLVED RISE / PROJECTION-COMPATIBLE / AMBIGUOUS; the spectral arm's 95 % minimum detectable ΔkT ≈ 0.198 keV; all 6 of RT-11's design objections accepted as design changes). The Virgo s0 baseline was re-checked by RT-12 (E040): the event level reproduces, but the ARFs are 4.2–4.7 % larger and the CCF set differs → temperatures are comparable, norms/SB are not (D57). 2D intensity stage 2 + the injection test (E042/R016, Provisional): the 2–5′ minor/disk 0.674 ± 0.100 is consistent with smooth β ellipticity and a ≥ +30 % bicone is excluded. 2D kT stage 3 (E043/R018, Provisional): estimator E3 + cone45, both arms agree, common footprint 56 %. The folded 2D kT map v2 (E046/T171, Provisional): a per-bin kT median band of 0.70–0.80 keV over 2–12′ (global 0.736 [0.723, 0.748]) and an all-angle slope of +0.009 keV/arcmin (+1.5σ) → no inner-cool/outer-hot trend at ≥ 2σ for this one-temperature proxy. The P18 end-to-end mock (E047/T172/R026, Provisional): 93.5 % power for the all-angle 2–12′ slope (62 % before the vignetting fix) but only 27–36 % per wedge at 2–8′. Literature summaries archived (Li+2007/2011, the 2026 SZ paper, Igarashi+2014: a flat kT profile cannot separate bound gas from a slow wind). |
| 工作 | Work | 项目新建 07_REVISION_LOG.md（R001–R020）与 08_RUNNING.md（每次信任/措辞变化一行，什么都不删）。Virgo 阶段 1 运行后因 B023 暂停，阶段 1b 重抽启动；mask 深度阶梯阶段 A；2D kT 生产图（P12）；折叠图 v2（P15）；P16（as-run 能段 + RASS）；P18 模拟；冷启动演练 2/3/4；红队 RT-11…RT-30 陆续启动与分诊；手册刷新 3 与修订轮 1。 |
The project creates 07_REVISION_LOG.md (R001–R020) and 08_RUNNING.md (one row per trust/wording change; nothing deleted). Virgo stage 1 ran and was then paused on B023, with stage 1b launched; the mask-depth ladder stage A; the 2D kT production maps (P12); the folded map v2 (P15); P16 (the as-run band + RASS); the P18 mock; cold-start drills 2/3/4; red teams RT-11…RT-30 launched and triaged in turn; handbook refresh 3 and fix round 1. |
| 问题（含 agent 自己的错误与更正） | Problems (including the agent's own errors and corrections) | B023：一次"假通过"被抓住——Virgo 阶段 1 的口径谱实际只带自动 mask（268 个 !ELLIPSE、701 个 v2 !CIRCLE 一个都没有），sol 在任何拟合前于阶段 5 步骤 0 抓住；谱在计数/曝光/面积上都正常，只有 REG 扩展里的 mask 身份不对。阶段 5 记为"未执行"，阶段 1b 重抽。当天第三例"照声明而非照实际运行写记录"：RT-18 从保存会话重放证实 v18 实际拟合源 0.375–9.0 keV、背景 0.375–6.23 keV（脚本注释的 0.4–3.2 keV 是错的，Sherpa notice/ignore 取并集）→ B025/R023。RT-17 推翻 mask 阶梯主结论（R020/D64）：v18 把源幂律固定在 0，轻 mask 偏 2–4′ kT +0.18…+0.22 keV → 全套 v2 mask 保留、窄阶段 B 取消；B024 的教训：结论的前提必须从"实际运行的最终状态"写起，而不是从模型声明写起（两条前提都取自声明）。RT-15 推翻自己 brief 的前提：v18 的 0.7 keV 前景槽位在 150 个保存拟合中均为零且冻结（R019）→ D62 只是外区 kT 的附带假设。RT-19：内区 N−S +0.10 keV 过不了 8 对比多重比较（族 p ≈ 0.22）→ 降为 Questioned（R022）。RT-10：Chandra-only "弱升 +0.16"撤回（R012）；芯片构成说法经 D61/R017 更正（9532/9533 是 ACIS-I 全前照芯片，不是 S3）。RT-16：固定 Z = 0.3 不是外升成因（Z = 1.5 真值在 8–10′ 只低 0.017 keV，D63）。RT-21：阶段 5 规格书的输入点名了错误的自动 mask bundle → D67 预先修订。RT-26：D55 门在算术上不可满足（组合 SP+CXB+QPB 同号和 +0.142 keV vs 门 0.10 keV）→ D71 预先补充。RT-24：E047 的真值折叠网格与拟合器逐位相同 → 响应误差未测。RT-25："无像过剩"按原措辞不成立，但该比值本身随后被 RT-28 撤回。RT-27：v18 加载了 RASS 但从未给它模型 → RASS 不约束任何东西。基础设施：多次静默停顿已续跑（NIM F008/F015/F017/F018 家族），手册写手数次以假"工具预算"文本结束 → 换新会话重写。 | B023: a "false pass" is caught — the Virgo stage-1 aperture spectra actually carry only the automatic mask (268 !ELLIPSEs, none of the 701 v2 !CIRCLEs), caught by sol at stage-5 step 0 before any fit; the spectra were normal in counts, exposure and area — only the mask identity in the REG extension was wrong. Stage 5 is recorded as "not executed" and stage 1b re-extracts. The day's third "written from a declaration rather than from what actually ran" case: RT-18 replayed from a saved session and confirmed v18 as run fits source 0.375–9.0 keV and background 0.375–6.23 keV (the script comment's 0.4–3.2 keV is wrong — Sherpa's notice/ignore take a union) → B025/R023. RT-17 overturned the mask ladder's headline (R020/D64): v18 freezes the source power law at 0, so a lighter mask biases the 2–4′ kT by +0.18…+0.22 keV → the full v2 mask stays and the narrow stage B is cancelled; B024's lesson: a conclusion's premises must be written from the final state actually run, not from a model declaration (both premises came from declarations). RT-15 refuted its own brief's premise: v18's 0.7 keV slot is zero and frozen in all 150 saved fits (R019) → D62 is only an assumption attached to the outer kT. RT-19: the inner N−S +0.10 keV fails the 8-contrast multiplicity check (family p ≈ 0.22) → downgraded to Questioned (R022). RT-10: the Chandra-only "weakly rising +0.16" is withdrawn (R012); the chip-mix wording was corrected by D61/R017 (9532/9533 are ACIS-I, all front-illuminated, not S3). RT-16: fixed Z = 0.3 is not the cause of the rise (a Z = 1.5 truth reads only 0.017 keV low at 8–10′, D63). RT-21: the stage-5 brief's input named the wrong automatic-mask bundle → D67 pre-data amendment. RT-26: D55's gate is arithmetically unsatisfiable (the combined SP+CXB+QPB same-sign sum +0.142 keV vs the 0.10 keV gate) → D71 pre-data addendum. RT-24: E047's truth folding grid is bit-for-bit the fitter's → response error untested. RT-25: "no image excess" is false as worded, but that ratio itself was then withdrawn by RT-28. RT-27: v18 loads RASS but never gives it a model → RASS constrains nothing. Infrastructure: several silent stalls were resumed (the NIM F008/F015/F017/F018 family) and the handbook writer ended several times on a fake "tool budget" text → new sessions rewrote the pages. |
| 待 PI 决定 | PI decisions pending | 无（当日无待决项；PI 的请求——折叠 kT 图 v2、B025 文本修订、冷却流定义 D66、mask 深度阶梯 D58——均当场执行）。 | None (no pending item that day; the PI's requests — the folded kT map v2, the B025 text fix, the cooling-flow definition D66 and the mask-depth ladder D58 — were all executed immediately). |
2026-10-17（阶段 5 判定 AMBIGUOUS；QPB 换血；P19/P21/P24/P25 收官；红队 RT-37…RT-47）
2026-10-17 (stage 5's verdict AMBIGUOUS; the QPB rebuilt; P19/P21/P24/P25 close; red teams RT-37…RT-47)
| 栏目Section | 内容Content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 成果（带信任状态） | Results (with their trust state) | 阶段 5 判定 = AMBIGUOUS（功率不足，不是"没有上升"）（Provisional，E049/T174/R040/D80）：ΔkT = kT(8–10′) − kT(2–4′) 的 95% 区间，谱拟合 S4 天空 A +0.13（−0.21…+0.42）/ 天空 B +0.19（−0.004…+0.42），Fe-L 硬度 +0.01（−0.32…+0.46）/ +0.07（−0.13…+0.33）；最小可探测 ΔkT 的 0.43 keV 只是高斯近似，按预先声明的非参数定义两方法都 > 0.50 keV（R042/D82，Opus 独立复核确认）。QPB 一路换血：交付的 back.pi 大 1e6–1e7 倍（B026）→ P22 重新生成 11:04Z 被接受（9/9 口径过量级门，R 0.884–1.005；MANIFEST 776/776 OK）→ 阶段 5b 在其上重跑 12:48Z 分诊：判定不变，天空 B 的 ΔkT +0.1886 → +0.1982（−0.034…+0.478），QPB 构造系统误差 0.010 keV（R046/D86）。P20（E048/T173/R039/D79，Provisional）：as-run 能段上只遮延展源+恒星仍把 R2-4_Angle1 的 kT 推高 +0.287 / +0.279 keV → D64 被确认并加强，机制仍被质疑。P21（E050/T175/R049/D89，Provisional；后续 R051/R052/R053/D91/D92/D93）：钉住一个 v18 世代后 image/v18 比值没有 ≥2σ 的径向上升（0.929 / 1.477 / 1.369，每步 <0.5σ，R12-14 未定义；MANIFEST 202/202 OK）——但构造被质疑（R7-9 逐相机闭合 1.311 vs 0.737，1.018 只是两者的平均；差别 0.574 ± 0.511 = 1.1σ 是泊松散差，不是校准分歧），绝对比值仍未定（天空模型 vs 经验天空把 R7-9 从 0.93 移到 1.77）。P24/P25（E051/E052/R052/R053/D92/D93，Provisional）：阶段 2 的软能段 QPB 图像归一是正确的（等于 FWC 重建的 1.4–4%，含 Al-K/Si-K 仪器线；2.13× 是"线在内 vs 线在外"），E042 的形态学比值移动 <5% → 形态学结论成立，但阶段 2 的绝对面亮度仍是 Questioned（±50–85% 的净）。RT-41：折叠图的 +2.19σ 是 13 个事后半径里的最大值，不显著；预先声明的统计量最高 +1.78σ（R047/D87）。RT-42：P23 的信息增益是 1.44/1.91 而非 2.66，且门对照自己就移动 0.11–0.20 keV → 加功率本身不给 RISE（R048/D88）。RT-43（interim）：Chandra 的 MDΔkT 只引稳健的 ≈0.30 keV（1.08 keV 是尾部假象，不得引用）；Chandra-only kT 为 Provisional，不得当作晕的 profile（R050/D90）。RT-45（本手册当读者）：14 个数字全部重放吻合，6 条过程/呈现缺陷已列入本阶段修订（R054/D94）。 | Stage 5's verdict is AMBIGUOUS (underpowered, not "no rise") (Provisional, E049/T174/R040/D80): the 95 % intervals for ΔkT = kT(8–10′) − kT(2–4′) are +0.13 (−0.21…+0.42) sky A and +0.19 (−0.004…+0.42) sky B for the spectral fit S4, and +0.01 (−0.32…+0.46) / +0.07 (−0.13…+0.33) for the Fe-L hardness; the minimum detectable ΔkT's 0.43 keV is only the Gaussian approximation, and under the pre-declared non-parametric definition both methods exceed 0.50 keV (R042/D82, confirmed by an independent Opus re-derivation). The QPB is rebuilt end to end: the delivered back.pi was 1e6–1e7× too large (B026) → P22's regeneration was accepted at 11:04Z (9/9 apertures pass the magnitude gate, R 0.884–1.005; MANIFEST 776/776 OK) → stage 5b's re-run on it was triaged at 12:48Z with the verdict unchanged, sky B's ΔkT +0.1886 → +0.1982 (−0.034…+0.478) and the QPB-construction systematic 0.010 keV (R046/D86). P20 (E048/T173/R039/D79, Provisional): on the as-run band, masking only extended sources + stars still biases R2-4_Angle1's kT up by +0.287 / +0.279 keV → D64 confirmed and strengthened, the mechanism still Questioned. P21 (E050/T175/R049/D89, Provisional; followed by R051/R052/R053/D91/D92/D93): with one v18 generation pinned, the image/v18 ratio shows no ≥2σ rise with radius (0.929 / 1.477 / 1.369, every step <0.5σ, R12-14 undefined; MANIFEST 202/202 OK) — but the construction is Questioned (the R7-9 per-camera closures are 1.311 vs 0.737 and the 1.018 is only their mean; the difference 0.574 ± 0.511 = 1.1σ is Poisson scatter, not a calibration disagreement), and the absolute ratio is still undetermined (sky model vs empirical sky moves R7-9 from 0.93 to 1.77). P24/P25 (E051/E052/R052/R053/D92/D93, Provisional): the stage-2 soft-band QPB image is correctly normalised (equal to the FWC rebuild within 1.4–4 % and carrying the Al-K/Si-K instrument lines; the 2.13× is "lines in vs lines out"), E042's morphology ratios move <5 % → the morphology claims stand, but stage-2 absolute surface brightness stays Questioned (±50–85 % of its net). RT-41: the folded map's +2.19σ is the maximum over 13 post-hoc split radii and is not significant; the pre-declared statistics peak at +1.78σ (R047/D87). RT-42: P23's information gain is 1.44/1.91, not 2.66, and the gate controls themselves move ΔkT by 0.11–0.20 keV → more power alone does not give RISE (R048/D88). RT-43 (interim): the Chandra MDΔkT is quoted only as robust ≈ 0.30 keV (the 1.08 keV is a tail artefact and must not be quoted); the Chandra-only kT is Provisional and is not quoted as the halo profile (R050/D90). RT-45 (this handbook as a reader): all 14 replayed numbers matched, and its 6 process/presentation defects are on this stage's fix list (R054/D94). |
| 工作 | Work | P19/P20/P21 三个自由执行器全程运行（P19 的 Chandra 匹配扇区重拟合仍在运行）；P22 QPB 重生成、阶段 5b 复跑、P24（R7-9 逐相机调和）、P25（软能段 QPB 归一）；红队 RT-37…RT-47 全线分诊（RT-46 撤回了“偏置指向当天空”，RT-47 修正了两处措辞），RT-48 与 RT-49 运行中；冷启动演练 5/6；手册刷新多轮（阶段 14/15e/21 已部署）。 | Three free executors ran all day (P19's Chandra matched-sector re-fit is still running); P22's QPB regeneration, the stage 5b re-check, P24 (the R7-9 per-camera reconciliation) and P25 (the soft-band QPB normalisation); red teams RT-37…RT-47 all triaged (RT-46 withdrew the offsets-as-sky idea, RT-47 corrected two wordings), with RT-48 and RT-49 running; cold-start drills 5/6; several handbook refreshes (stages 14/15e/21 deployed). |
| 问题（含 agent 自己的错误与更正） | Problems (including the agent's own errors and corrections) | P21 的单位/符号错误（B028）：第一份 image/v18 比值表的 image_SB 全是负的（天空速率没除曝光、分母又多乘一个 arcmin²）→ 该表废弃，执行者修正后重跑（R043/D83）。P21 的线集错用（B029）：ratio_pinned.py 给 mos2 用了 mos1 的线集（代码 160–161 行）——P24 的"0.5–2 keV 净为负"由此而生，已被订正；0.7–1.0 keV 的表格 1% 内不变（R053/D93c）。P24 的 erratum：E051 曾把"软能段 QPB 图像归一待定"写成新开问题，P25 之后改为"归一正确、开放项是线记账"（R053/D93a）。"相机不一致"的过度表述被撤回：RT-44 说 R7-9 两台相机不一致 ×1.8，P24 重放证明那是 1.1σ 泊松散差被净/总比（13–21%）放大 → D92a 明令永不引用"相机不一致 ×1.8"。RT-44/RT-46 启动即死（RT-44 首次启动 13:40Z 前死亡、RT-46 首次 16:21Z 死亡）→ 各重启一次（F037）；RT-47 亦以 "TOOL CALLS FAILED (0/1 succeeded)" 死亡后重启（F039）；RT-36 无报告死亡（由 RT-38 取代）、RT-33 无异议死亡（由 RT-35 重试）。手册自身的缺陷：RT-45 的 6 条——index.html 把已完成的 P21 与阶段 5b 仍写成"运行中/待定"、把活跃的 RT-44 写成"启动即死"、13′ 凸起写成裸 1.37、引用了不存在的 cognition-os/CLAUDE.md、physics.html 教学算例的指数错 10×/10×/≈2000×（R054/D94，本阶段已全部修订）。RT-37：v18 CSV 的误差列无效（67 行里 32 行 kT_err_high < 0、3 行非有限）→ 不得从该 CSV 引任何区间；保存的 R8-10_Angle1 拟合 kT 0.6235 与 CSV 的 0.967 不一致。RT-39：天空 B 的 −0.004 下界依赖插值网格；"0.43 keV 是 50% 功率最小可探测值"不成立。RT-40：R8-10 的重生成运行重分箱（32→31）→ 天空 A 的 −0.036 keV 不是干净的 QPB 系统误差。 |
P21's unit/sign error (B028): the first image/v18 ratio table had negative image_SB in all four regions (the sky rate was not divided by the exposure and the denominator carried an extra arcmin²) → that table is Deprecated and the executor fixed and re-ran it (R043/D83). P21's line-set slip (B029): ratio_pinned.py used the mos1 line set for mos2 (code lines 160–161) — this is what produced P24's "negative 0.5–2 keV net", now corrected; the 0.7–1.0 keV table is unchanged within 1 % (R053/D93c). P24's erratum: E051 once wrote "the soft-band QPB image normalisation is open" as a new open problem; after P25 it reads "correctly normalised, the open item is the line bookkeeping" (R053/D93a). The "cameras disagree" overstatement is withdrawn: RT-44 said the two cameras disagree by ×1.8 at R7-9; P24's replay showed that is a 1.1σ Poisson scatter amplified by the net/gross ratio (13–21 %) → D92a forbids ever quoting "cameras disagree by ×1.8". RT-44 and RT-46 died at startup (RT-44 before its 13:40Z launch, RT-46 at 16:21Z) → each relaunched once (F037); RT-47 also died with "TOOL CALLS FAILED (0/1 succeeded)" and was relaunched (F039); RT-36 died without a report (replaced by RT-38) and RT-33 died without objections (retried as RT-35). The handbook's own defects: RT-45's 6 — index.html still showed the finished P21 and stage 5b as "running/pending", wrote the active RT-44 as "died at startup", quoted the 13′ bump as a bare 1.37, cited a cognition-os/CLAUDE.md that does not exist, and physics.html's teaching example had exponents wrong by 10×/10×/≈2000× (R054/D94; all fixed in this stage). RT-37: the v18 CSV's error columns are invalid (32 of 67 rows have kT_err_high < 0 and 3 are non-finite) → no interval may be quoted from that CSV; the saved R8-10_Angle1 fit (kT 0.6235) disagrees with the CSV (0.967). RT-39: sky B's −0.004 lower bound depends on the interpolation grid; "0.43 keV is the minimum detectable value at 50 % power" does not hold. RT-40: the R8-10 regenerated run re-bins (32→31) → sky A's −0.036 keV is not a clean QPB systematic. |
| 待 PI 决定 | PI decisions pending | P23（给 Q-B 增加检验功率的方案）——唯一待 PI 批准项（D82d/D88，建议未经评审）：形状已重排为先用偏置指向 0501/0601 测天空（零新增曝光，但这些产品是旧 mask 合同，必须先按 v2 重新归约 = P5），然后才考虑 MOS2+pn0 的 8–10′/8–12′ 孔径；MOS1/pn 口径没有申请。引用 0.31–0.36 keV 的最小可探测（不是 Opus 的 0.26）。要同时告诉 PI：加功率只把区间变窄，本身不把 AMBIGUOUS 变成 RISE——14 个门对照自己就把 ΔkT 移动 0.11–0.20 keV，而门是 0.10 keV，所以任何重跑前每个对照都要有自己的区间（D82c/D88b）。P22 的 QPB 重生成当时是作为已批准交付物的 bug 修复派出的（D77b），也需在向 PI 汇报时说明。 | P23 (the power-increasing plan for Q-B) — the only item awaiting PI approval (D82d/D88, a suggestion not yet reviewed): its shape is re-ordered to measure the sky from the offset pointings 0501/0601 first (zero new exposure, but those products are on the old-mask contract and must be re-reduced on v2 first = P5), and only then consider MOS2+pn0 apertures at 8–10′/8–12′; MOS1/pn apertures are not requested. Quote a minimum detectable of 0.31–0.36 keV (not Opus's 0.26). The PI must also be told that more power only narrows the interval — it does not by itself turn AMBIGUOUS into RISE, because the 14 gate controls themselves move ΔkT by 0.11–0.20 keV against the 0.10 keV gate, so any re-run needs per-control intervals first (D82c/D88b). P22's QPB regeneration was dispatched as a bug-fix of an approved deliverable (D77b) and should be reported to the PI as such. |
cognition-os/sessions/2026-10-14.md（含 10-15 全部条目）+ sessions/2026-10-16.md + sessions/2026-10-17.md；06_AGENT_LOG.md；07_REVISION_LOG.md R001–R054；04_DECISION_LOG.md D46–D94；08_RUNNING.md 18:06Z；REDTEAM_QUEUE.md（读取于 2026-10-17 19:41Z）